SOL2015 March 20 That's Not Correct
A
conversation with a group of teachers yesterday about correcting errors in
writing has had me thinking today. We know inexperienced writers make errors. We
also know experienced writers make mistakes. Learning cannot take place without
some level of error. One of the greatest issues a developing writer can face is
to be inhibited from responding, for fear of being wrong.
When a
young writer tackles an unfamiliar word in their writing and spells it
correctly they confirm their existing beliefs concerning that word. If they
happen to get it ‘wrong’ then they learn something just as important. They
learn that they must modify their belief about that word. The writer learns by
testing their existing belief. This is the kind of healthy risk taking we must
encourage in our classrooms. Writers should not be afraid to tackle new words.
I recall
with glowing pride as a Grade 1 writer tackled the word aquarium in her writing, because
‘fish tank’ just wouldn’t do. We celebrated the risk taking with much ceremony
during the share time that day. The next lesson saw many more risk takers
emerge in that writing community. I further recall reading Frank Smith’s ‘Essays
Into Literacy,’ many years ago, where Smith wrote, ‘Children do not learn from being corrected but from wanting to do
things the right way.’ Children do not become better writers by writing
less, and this is the possible negative outcome from an over emphasis on correction.
Correction
is beneficial when students sees the need for it. When they have an authentic
purpose for the writing they are doing, they engage in the process with purpose
and a desire to make it work for the reader. The pen that makes the correction must
be in the hand of the writer, not the teacher. Correction needs to be about ownership
rather than imposition. Most of the effort
expended by teachers playing the part of the correction police is
largely a waste of time. It overwhelms the learner and openly discourages
effort in the mind of the hapless victim. Imagine how we, as adults would feel
if someone took hold of our notebooks and started correcting them for spelling
and grammar?
Jeff
Anderson’s idea of issuing students with’ an invitation to explore’ exemplars
of good writing has always struck me as a
wonderful way to deal with many of the issues that young writers deal with
as they grapple with making their writing ‘reader friendly.’
By
consistently sharing models of great writing we have the opportunity to
highlight the conventional wisdom regarding spelling, grammar and sentence
construction. Armed with this information the young writer is then invited to
conduct a discrepancy analysis and make the appropriate changes. Again, more
power to the writer…
Do we
want students to be able to identify errors and make corrections, or do we want
them to use the power of punctuation to create messages that resonate with
clarity and beauty? Actually, we want both!
Last
Friday I felt a little frivolous. Today I feel the need to be an advocate for
all those young writers out there. I still remember being one myself and the
disempowering feeling of having my writing ravaged by the red pen people. Those written remarks were usually the only feedback we received
for our efforts.
I am so glad I read this before I delved into the pile of papers in my bag, ready to make corrections. It's report card time and I need to make decisions about student writing- are they on grade level when it comes to writing? What does a third grade "on level" piece of writing look like? Are they using capitalization consistently? Punctuation? Are they applying spelling strategies? How do I communicate all this in a way that doesn't discourage them from writing but also acknowledges the work we have to do? I completely agree with you about purpose and audience motivating the writer to make his/her piece the best it can be. But what if the student still isn't really motivated to put time and care into the writing? What to do with the lackluster pieces that are missing clarity and care? How can I give meaningful, positive feedback that doesn't ignore the areas where students still need to learn?
ReplyDeleteSo many great questions Kathleen. I guess it's about the quality of the feedback we provide -written and verbal and how it must be designed to assist the writer to improve- move forward, develop. We also want them to gradually assume more responsibility for the writing. When a student lacks motivation, we must ask why? Invariably, it is a lack of self belief or confidence. I am continually reinforcing and celebrating effort. The research suggests if our feedback focuses on this area we are more likely to get traction. So rather than being rebuffed by those students who are seeming to be resistant, I reach them by focusing a lot of my verbal feedback on student's who demonstrate 'stickability.' it tends to subtly evoke a change in those less confident writers. They think, well maybe I can also buy into this.It overcomes passive resistance.
DeleteThis is a very important post. It's so tough in our CCS world to send papers home or to publish unless it's nearly perfect as that seems to be what is expected. Yet, the result is students writing serviceable passages and teachers marking up the best they can.
ReplyDeleteAnita, it's sad that student writing is serviceable rather than inspired. We have much work to do it seems, in teaching parents and administrators about the developmental nature of writing. These practices act as a stricture to writing development.
DeleteThis is the message we need teachers to understand. Too many were taught with the red ink bleeding on their papers, so they think that is what a writing teacher does. I will print this out to share with my teachers and have that discussion as we look at student work. BTW, I have read that chapter from your book to groups of teachers. Love it!
ReplyDeleteElsie, you are so right. It's called the primacy effect. So many of us tend to initially teach the way we were taught. We repeat this awful action. An action that does little to develop the writer. So glad my book has been of service to you. Red pen people beware! We're onto you!
DeleteGreat points on the tyranny of the red pen. To give the student the power to learn and make corrections.
ReplyDelete"The pen that makes the correction must be in the hand of the writer, not the teacher. Correction needs to be about ownership rather than imposition."
Well said.
Thanks Pamela. I tend to be a bit of a zealot on this one, but I sincerely believe over emphasis on correction hampers writing confidence, risk taking and ultimately it hinders development,
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete