Strengthening The Writing Link Between Classroom And The Home
I have encountered numerous young writers who wrote in multiple notebooks in order to overcome the limitations some schools impose on taking writer’s notebooks out of the classroom. One young writer had three notebooks, adopting the Goldilocks theory- small, medium and large. The large notebook was for school. The medium sized notebook was for writing at home and the small notebook was used exclusively to write poetry –at home. A most organized young writer.
Some schools have been proactive in setting up a Take Home Notebook initiative, where a dedicated writer’s notebook housed in a backpack, messenger bag, or briefcase, is taken home by individual class members on a rotating schedule. The notebook becomes a public document shared across that class.
Entries in these class notebooks often display a pleasing diversity in subject matter and presentation. A diversity beyond individual notebook entries. Teachers have frequently remarked how the quality of writing recorded in the class notebook is often of a superior quality to that of individual notebooks. I suspect the answer lies in the public nature of the shared notebook. In some classes, one take home writing kit proved insufficient and a second kit had to introduced -such was the popularity of the kit and the urge to write in the notebook at home.
I have written at length regarding this ‘school to home’ writing idea. Should educators be interested in implementing this initiative in their classroom, more information is available by following this link:
It is when student writers begin to value the places from which they are from, that their writing changes. No doubt about it. They write about what they know, developing a voice possessed of increasing expertise. They write using words and grammatical conventions they understand, rather than trying to fit their ideas into some pre-ordained template.
Their writers’ voices become less contrived and they find it easier to write longer pieces, revealing greater understanding of the topics and issues addressed. They begin to connect to these topics because they can appreciate the real world surrounding their thoughts and they write in a space that is less likely to possess distractions.
When classroom discussions revolve around place, the writer with knowledge of that place becomes the expert. They begin to realize their writing matters. This empowers students as stakeholders within their writing community and strengthens a connection to a place. They may may carry that connection with them, their entire lives.
The home presents as an eminently suitable place to begin this transformative journey. It is a safe and familiar setting from which to begin thinking more broadly about writing. From home, the writer can begin to venture further afield. I would use the analogy of a stone being lobbed into a lake. The ripples move out from the centre, just as the writing focus moves out from the home as the base.
Erin Donovan, from Coastal Carolina University reported on ‘Learning the Language of Home: Using Place-based Writing Practice to Help Rural Students Connect to Their Communities.’
Donovan noted, ‘Increasing the amount of time students spend writing, both at home and school, has significant implications for improving writing outcomes. Providing students with many and different opportunities to write builds familiarity with the writing process. If students are comfortable with writing, they are likely to become stronger, better writers.’
Some benefits of writing beyond the classroom:
It increases the relevance of learning.
It nurtures creativity and imagination.
It develops learning through experimentation.
It exposes young writers to new opportunities and possibilities for writing.
It broadens the scope of possible writing locations and ideas.
It nurtures awareness of environments and wider surroundings.
Alan j Wright
Comments
Post a Comment